Cost model
Without a layerYou pay per message, token, or seat for hosted inference on your domain.
With ContinueWith$0 AI usage — visitors continue in assistants they already pay for.
Comparison
Handoff infrastructure beats another chat surface.
Compare ContinueWith to on-site chatbots: $0 inference, no transcript storage, provider-neutral continuations, and analytics at the website-to-AI transition.
Privacy
Without a layerConversations often live on your stack; retention and compliance are your problem.
With ContinueWithNo conversation storage. We only measure the handoff — page, prompt, assistant, timestamp.
Assistant choice
Without a layerOne vendor model inside your widget; switching providers means rebuilding.
With ContinueWithNeutral across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, and Mistral.
What you measure
Without a layerIn-widget deflection, CSAT, sometimes transcript search.
With ContinueWithContinuation rate, assistant distribution, page attribution, prompt performance.
Time to live
Without a layerFlows, guardrails, knowledge base, branding — weeks for a serious rollout.
With ContinueWithOne script tag. Live in minutes on Ghost, WordPress, Next.js, Webflow, or plain HTML.
FAQ
Should I replace my support chatbot with ContinueWith?
Not necessarily. Chatbots answer inside your domain for support automation. ContinueWith is for research continuations — when visitors want to explore your topic in ChatGPT or Claude with your page attached. Many teams use both for different jobs.
Does ContinueWith answer questions on my site?
No. ContinueWith is infrastructure, not a chatbot. It sends visitors to the assistant they already use with structured context — URL, title, selection, and your prompt templates.
What ROI can I expect vs a chatbot?
We do not promise conversion lifts. Reasonable outcomes: visibility into an emerging AI channel, lower friction for visitors who already use assistants, and $0 inference compared with hosted chat.